win64 packaging: fix comment
authorRafaël Carré <funman@videolan.org>
Sun, 6 Nov 2011 01:06:37 +0000 (21:06 -0400)
committerRafaël Carré <funman@videolan.org>
Sun, 6 Nov 2011 01:06:37 +0000 (21:06 -0400)
commitdde3c27230cb444d07cc22f3c7835c6e5db88a9e
treeaa977dfc347263da7faf305f9694a75bb947d58c
parentebac954fe8d642adc49c4b237f3ef322b4eeb818
win64 packaging: fix comment

It is not clear that static linking is superior in our case
Shared linking could even reduce package size (only one copy of libstdc++ shipped)

21:04 < jon_y> libtool prevents static linking if you are working with dlls, it is by
               design
Makefile.am